Contents
Carbon Steel vs Stainless Steel: Properties, Cost, Application
- John
Many believe that the main distinction between carbon steel and stainless steel is their resistance to rust, which is accomplished with at least 10.5% chromium content. However, numerous other distinctions exist beyond this, with implications for practical use.
This article explores differences in mechanical properties and other perspectives, aiming to enhance understanding and aid in selecting the appropriate steel for diverse Industries.
What is Carbon Steel?
Carbon steel, or plain carbon steel, has 0.05% to 2% carbon and iron, usually in solid form. It can also refer to non-stainless steel, including alloy steel. It is classified as low, medium, or high-carbon steel. Strength, ductility, and weldability are key traits, making it common in construction. It is mainly processed by hot rolling. Compared to stainless steel, carbon steel has lower corrosion resistance, limiting its use in harsh environments.
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) states the Definition of Carbon Steel
Definition by AISI: Carbon steel has no specified minimum content for elements like chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, nickel, niobium, titanium, tungsten, vanadium, zirconium, or other alloying elements.
Copper Content: Maximum copper content is 0.40%.
Maximum Specified Contents:
- Manganese: 1.65%
- Silicon: 0.60%
- Copper: 0.60%
What Does Stainless Steel Mean?
Stainless steel, or inox, means “not oxidizing,” indicating high corrosion resistance. It contains at least 10.5% chromium, which forms a thin, protective oxide layer on the surface. This passive film prevents further oxidation and rust. If scratched, chromium will react with oxygen to restore the layer. Stainless steel can be classified into types like austenitic, ferritic, and martensitic, each suited for various applications, showcasing the versatility of corrosion-resistant metals.
Chemical Properties of Carbon Steel vs Stainless Steel
Carbon content in carbon steel mainly affects strength, with higher levels increasing hardness but decreasing ductility. In contrast, chromium in stainless steel significantly enhances corrosion resistance, allowing it to perform well in harsh environments.
Element | Carbon Steel (wt%) | Stainless Steel (wt%) |
Carbon (C) | 0.05 – 2.0 | 0.03 max |
Manganese (Mn) | 0.30 – 1.65 | / |
Silicon (Si) | 0.15 – 0.60 | / |
Copper (Cu) | 0.0 – 0.40 | 0.0 – 0.50 |
Chromium (Cr) | / | 10.5 – 30.0 |
Nickel (Ni) | / | 0.0 – 20.0 |
Molybdenum (Mo) | / | 0.0 – 8.0 |
Vanadium (V) | / | 0.0 – 0.10 |
Titanium (Ti) | / | 0.0 – 0.60 |
Nitrogen (N) | / | 0.0 – 0.25 |
Phosphorus (P) | 0.0 – 0.04 | 0.0 – 0.045 |
Sulfur (S) | 0.0 – 0.05 | 0.0 – 0.03 |
Corrosion Resistance:
- Carbon Steel: Generally low corrosion resistance due to the lack of chromium; prone to rusting when exposed to moisture and acids, leading to degradation.
- Stainless Steel: High corrosion resistance from chromium (minimum 10.5%), which forms a protective oxide layer, preventing rust and enhancing durability.
Chemical Reactivity:
- Carbon Steel: More reactive with acids and environmental factors, resulting in higher susceptibility to rust; the absence of chromium and other alloying elements contributes to this reactivity.
- Stainless Steel: Less reactive because of chromium and other alloying elements like nickel and molybdenum, which stabilize the structure and enhance resistance to chemical attack.
Electrochemical Properties:
- Carbon Steel: Higher susceptibility to galvanic corrosion in the presence of moisture, as it lacks the protective oxide layer found in stainless steel.
- Stainless Steel: Better electrochemical stability due to its alloy composition, making it more suitable for use in corrosive environments.
Carbon Steel vs. Stainless Steel: Mechanical Properties
Stainless steel has relatively higher strength (up to 1,500 MPa) and hardness (up to 350 HB) than carbon steel, making it better suited for applications requiring durability and wear resistance. Stainless steel has better elongation and toughness to perform effectively in harsh environments.
Properties | Carbon Steel (Metric) | Carbon Steel (Imperial) | Stainless Steel (Metric) | Stainless Steel (Imperial) |
Tensile Strength | 370 – 700 MPa | 53,000 – 101,500 psi | 520 – 1,500 MPa | 75,000 – 217,500 psi |
Yield Strength | 250 – 450 MPa | 36,000 – 65,000 psi | 210 – 1,100 MPa | 30,000 – 160,000 psi |
Vickers Hardness | 120 – 250 HV | 120 – 250 HV | 150 – 300 HV | 150 – 300 HV |
Brinell Hardness | 120 – 300 HB | 120 – 300 HB | 150 – 350 HB | 150 – 350 HB |
Rockwell Hardness | 60 – 100 HRB | 60 – 100 HRB | 80 – 100 HRC | 80 – 100 HRC |
Elongation | 10% – 30% | 10% – 30% | 30% – 50% | 30% – 50% |
Elastic Modulus | 200 – 210 GPa | 29,000 – 30,500 ksi | 190 – 200 GPa | 27,500 – 29,000 ksi |
Strength:
- Tensile Strength: Carbon steel ranges from 370 – 700 MPa (53,000 – 101,500 psi), while stainless steel is significantly stronger at 520 – 1,500 MPa (75,000 – 217,500 psi). Tensile strength measures maximum stress before breaking, indicating that stainless steel can handle greater loads without failure.
- Yield Strength: Carbon steel has a yield strength of 250 – 450 MPa (36,000 – 65,000 psi), compared to 210 – 1,100 MPa (30,000 – 160,000 psi) for stainless steel. Yield strength is the stress where plastic deformation starts, showing that stainless steel maintains its shape better under high stress.
Hardness:
- Vickers Hardness: Carbon steel typically falls between 120 – 250 HV, while stainless steel is harder, ranging from 150 – 300 HV. Increased hardness in stainless steel contributes to its wear resistance.
- Brinell Hardness: Carbon steel has values of 120 – 300 HB, whereas stainless steel shows a range of 150 – 350 HB, indicating that stainless steel is generally more resistant to indentation and deformation.
Toughness and Ductility:
- Elongation: Carbon steel exhibits 10% – 30% elongation, indicating moderate ductility. In contrast, stainless steel has a higher elongation of 30% – 50%, showcasing better toughness and the ability to withstand stress without fracturing.
Elastic Modulus:
Elastic Modulus: Carbon steel ranges from 200 – 210 GPa (29,000 – 30,500 ksi), slightly higher than stainless steel’s 190 – 200 GPa (27,500 – 29,000 ksi). This suggests that carbon steel is stiffer, while stainless steel can absorb more energy during deformation.
Carbon Steel vs. Stainless Steel: Physical Properties
Carbon steel has a higher thermal conductivity and melting point, while stainless steel offers better insulation and density, resulting in increased strength and durability.
Property | Carbon Steel (Metric) | Carbon Steel (Imperial) | Stainless Steel (Metric) | Stainless Steel (Imperial) |
Density | 7.75 – 8.05 g/cm³ | 0.28 – 0.29 lb/in³ | 7.90 – 8.10 g/cm³ | 0.285 – 0.293 lb/in³ |
Melting Point | 1425 – 1540 °C | 2600 – 2800 °F | 1400 – 1450 °C | 2550 – 2640 °F |
Thermal Conductivity | 50 – 60 W/m·K | 34 – 42 BTU·in/(hr·ft²·°F) | 15 – 25 W/m·K | 10 – 17 BTU·in/(hr·ft²·°F) |
Electrical Resistivity | 0.0006 – 0.0007 Ω·m | 0.0006 – 0.0007 Ω·m | 0.0007 – 0.0008 Ω·m | 0.0007 – 0.0008 Ω·m |
Specific Heat Capacity | 460 – 500 J/(kg·K) | 110 – 120 BTU/(lb·°F) | 500 – 520 J/(kg·K) | 120 – 124 BTU/(lb·°F) |
Thermal Expansion Coefficient | 11 – 13 x 10⁻⁶/K | 11 – 13 x 10⁻⁶/°F | 15 – 17 x 10⁻⁶/K | 15 – 17 x 10⁻⁶/°F |
Density:
- Carbon Steel: Ranges from 7.75 – 8.05 g/cm³ (0.28 – 0.29 lb/in³). The higher density provides good strength, making it ideal for structural applications.
- Stainless Steel: Slightly denser at 7.90 – 8.10 g/cm³ (0.285 – 0.293 lb/in³), which contributes to its strength and durability.
Melting Point:
- Carbon Steel: Melting points range from 1425 – 1540 °C (2600 – 2800 °F). The higher melting point allows for easier processing at elevated temperatures.
- Stainless Steel: Melting points are slightly lower at 1400 – 1450 °C (2550 – 2640 °F), affecting its applications in high-temperature environments.
Thermal Conductivity:
- Carbon Steel: Exhibits 50 – 60 W/m·K (34 – 42 BTU·in/(hr·ft²·°F)), making it a good conductor of heat.
- Stainless Steel: Lower thermal conductivity at 15 – 25 W/m·K (10 – 17 BTU·in/(hr·ft²·°F)), which can limit its use in heat-exchanging applications.
Electrical Resistivity:
- Carbon Steel: Shows resistivity of 0.0006 – 0.0007 Ω·m. This characteristic makes it suitable for various electrical applications.
- Stainless Steel: Slightly higher resistivity at 0.0007 – 0.0008 Ω·m, which may affect its electrical conductivity.
Specific Heat Capacity:
- Carbon Steel: Ranges from 460 – 500 J/(kg·K) (110 – 120 BTU/(lb·°F)), indicating good heat retention.
- Stainless Steel: Higher values at 500 – 520 J/(kg·K) (120 – 124 BTU/(lb·°F)), allowing it to absorb more heat before temperature changes.
Thermal Expansion Coefficient:
- Carbon Steel: Ranges from 11 – 13 x 10⁻⁶/K (11 – 13 x 10⁻⁶/°F). Its lower coefficient means less expansion under heat.
- Stainless Steel: Slightly higher at 15 – 17 x 10⁻⁶/K (15 – 17 x 10⁻⁶/°F), which can lead to more expansion but also more adaptability in certain applications.
Cost Differences Between Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel
Material Costs
Carbon steel is cheaper due to its simpler production and fewer alloying elements. Stainless steel is pricier because it includes chromium, nickel, and various elements that improve its characteristics.
Manufacturing Costs
The processing and manufacturing costs for stainless steel are higher due to several factors:
- Melting and Alloying: Requires precise control of elements like chromium and nickel, increasing complexity and cost.
- Forming and Shaping: Harder to form, needing specialized equipment and more energy, raising processing costs.
- Heat Treatment: Some grades need specific heat treatments, adding time and expense.
- Finishing: Additional processes like grinding and polishing increase the overall cost.
Maintenance Costs
Stainless steel’s superior corrosion resistance reduces maintenance and long-term costs. Carbon steel requires protective coatings and regular upkeep, increasing overall costs over time.
Lifespan and Durability
Stainless steel’s elevated price is balanced by its extended longevity and sturdiness, particularly in corrosive settings. Carbon steel, while less expensive at first, frequently incurs greater long-term expenses due to regular repairs and replacements.
In summary, while carbon steel is more cost-effective initially, stainless steel can offer better value in long-term applications due to its durability and lower maintenance requirements.
Comparison of Machining Properties of Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel
Machining and welding are key processes in fabricating any structure from steel. Stainless steel, as a difficult-to-machine metal, requires specialized tools and techniques. However, it can be processed, though carbon steel is a more convenient choice.
Cutting Machining
Carbon Steel
- Processing Methods: Turning, milling, drilling, and grinding.
- Effects: Carbon steel machines easily, allowing for good surface finishes and high precision.
- Considerations: Use sharp tools to prevent work hardening and overheating; proper lubrication is essential to reduce friction.
Stainless Steel
- Processing Methods: Turning, milling, drilling, and grinding with specialized tools; difficult to machine using standard methods.
- Effects: More challenging due to toughness and work hardening, requiring higher cutting speeds and tool materials.
- Considerations: Utilize cutting fluids and tools designed for stainless steel; avoid overheating to prevent discoloration and damage.
Learn about our steel cutting services!
Plastic Forming
Carbon Steel
- Processing Methods: Forging, rolling, and bending.
- Effects: Good ductility allows for effective shaping at room temperature or elevated temperatures.
- Considerations: The carbon content can affect formability; higher carbon steels may require heating.
Stainless Steel
- Processing Methods: Hot working and cold working; limited formability at low temperatures.
- Effects: Can be formed but may lead to increased hardness and reduced ductility after cold working.
- Considerations: Heat treatment may be necessary to restore ductility after cold working.
Heat Treatment
Carbon Steel
- Processing Methods: Annealing, quenching, and tempering.
- Effects: Significantly enhances hardness, strength, and ductility.
- Considerations: Proper control of heating and cooling rates is crucial to avoid distortion and cracking.
Stainless Steel
- Processing Methods: Solution annealing and aging; not suitable for all heat treatments like carbon steel.
- Effects: Improves corrosion resistance and mechanical properties.
- Considerations: Different grades require specific temperatures and times; avoid overheating to prevent loss of corrosion resistance.
Welding
Carbon Steel
- Processing Methods: MIG, TIG, and arc welding.
- Effects: Good weldability with minimal preheat requirements.
- Considerations: Ensure proper joint design and heat input to avoid warping.
Stainless Steel
- Processing Methods: TIG and MIG welding; requires specific techniques not needed for carbon steel.
- Effects: Strong, clean welds possible; higher risk of distortion and chromium carbide precipitation.
- Considerations: Use compatible filler materials; control heat input to minimize warping and maintain corrosion resistance.
Surface Treatment
Carbon Steel
- Processing Methods: Galvanizing, painting, and coating.
- Effects: Enhances corrosion resistance and appearance.
- Considerations: Proper surface preparation is essential for adhesion of coatings.
Stainless Steel
- Processing Methods: Passivation, electropolishing, and coatings; requires more care compared to carbon steel.
- Effects: Increases corrosion resistance and improves aesthetics.
- Considerations: Ensure surface cleanliness before treatment to avoid contamination.
Overall, carbon steel generally offers better machinability and plastic forming capabilities, while stainless steel requires more specialized techniques and careful handling during processing. Understanding these differences helps in selecting the appropriate methods for specific applications.
Environmental Factors Affecting Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel
In addition to environmental corrosion, there are other factors that can affect carbon or stainless steel, resulting in reduced performance and reduced service life.
Temperature Variations:
- Carbon Steel: Can lose strength and hardness at high temperatures and become brittle at very low temperatures, making it suitable for moderate temperature applications.
- Stainless Steel: Preserves its durability and integrity over a broader temperature spectrum, encompassing both high and low extremes. Austenitic grades, in particular, are effective in high-temperature environments up to 1000°C.
Oxidation:
- Carbon Steel: Prone to oxidation when exposed to air and moisture, leading to rust. Requires regular maintenance to protect against oxidation, such as applying paint, varnish, or chrome plating.
- Stainless Steel: Forms a stable oxide layer that protects against further oxidation, requiring less maintenance and proving more durable in oxidizing conditions.
Chemical Exposure:
- Carbon Steel: Vulnerable to chemical reactions with acids, salts, and other chemicals, which can cause rapid corrosion and material degradation.
- Stainless Steel: Withstands various chemicals, including acids and alkaline solutions, making it perfect for chemical processing sectors.
Humidity:
- Carbon Steel: High humidity levels can accelerate corrosion and rust formation, necessitating protective measures.
- Stainless Steel: Performs well in high humidity due to its corrosion resistance, suitable for environments with fluctuating humidity levels.
Stress and Fatigue:
- Carbon Steel: Can develop stress corrosion cracking in certain environments, particularly where chlorides are present. Frequent inspections and upkeep are necessary to maintain integrity.
- Stainless Steel: Generally more resistant to stress corrosion cracking, especially in chloride-rich environments, providing better longevity under cyclic loading and stress.
UV Exposure:
- Carbon Steel: UV exposure can degrade protective coatings over time, requiring regular reapplication to maintain protection.
- Stainless Steel: Unaffected by UV exposure, maintaining its appearance and integrity without the need for additional protection.
Environmental Friendliness:
- Carbon Steel: Generally less environmentally friendly due to higher maintenance needs and potential complications in recycling treated materials.
- Stainless Steel: More environmentally friendly due to its durability, lower maintenance requirements, and higher recycling rates. Its extended durability and corrosion resistance render it a more sustainable option in numerous applications.
While stainless steel typically outperforms carbon steel in many environmental conditions, carbon steel can still be preferable in moderate environments due to its lower initial cost and sufficient performance when properly maintained.
Application Differences Between Carbon Steel vs Stainless Steel
Construction:
- Carbon Steel: Widely used for structural beams, reinforcing bars, and infrastructure due to its strength and affordability.
- Stainless Steel: Used in architectural elements, cladding, and facades where corrosion resistance and aesthetic appeal are important.
Automotive:
- Carbon Steel: Utilized for chassis, body panels, and engine components for its strength and cost-effectiveness.
- Stainless Steel: Preferred for exhaust systems, trim, and parts exposed to high heat and corrosion.
Medical:
- Carbon Steel: Rarely used, except in non-critical applications.
- Stainless Steel: Essential for surgical tools, implants, and medical equipment due to its biocompatibility and capacity for sterilization.
Oil and Gas:
- Carbon Steel: Employed for pipelines and structural components in less corrosive environments.
- Stainless Steel: Vital in severe conditions, like offshore platforms and refineries, due to its excellent corrosion resistance.
Aerospace:
- Carbon Steel: Used in some structural components but limited by weight considerations.
- Stainless Steel: Utilized for high-strength, corrosion-resistant parts like fasteners and engine components.
Household:
- Carbon Steel: Common in tools, frames, and general hardware.
- Stainless Steel: Preferred for appliances, cookware, and cutlery due to its durability and aesthetic finish.
Food and Beverage:
- Carbon Steel: Limited use in food processing equipment due to corrosion risk.
- Stainless Steel: Crucial for kitchen tools, processing equipment, and storage tanks due to its cleanliness and rust resistance.
Comparison of Specific Grades in Different Industries
Industry | Application | Carbon Steel Grade | Stainless Steel Grade |
Construction | Structural Beams | ASTM A36, A992 | × |
Architectural Elements | × | 304, 316 | |
Automotive | Chassis | AISI 1010, 1020 | × |
Exhaust Systems | × | 409, 430 | |
Food & Beverage | Processing Equipment | × | 304, 316 |
Storage Tanks | × | 304, 316 | |
Medical | Surgical Instruments | × | 316L, 420 |
Implants | × | 316L, 317L | |
Oil & Gas | Pipelines | API 5L Grade B, X42 | × |
Offshore Platforms | × | 316, 316L | |
Aerospace | Structural Components | AISI 4130 | × |
Engine Components | × | 321, 347 | |
Household | Tools | AISI 1045, 1050 | × |
Appliances | × | 304, 316 |
In short, carbon steel is favored for its cost and high strength and is ideal for less corrosive work environments. However, it is more expensive to maintain later. Stainless steel, though more expensive, excels in corrosion resistance, hygiene, and durability in harsh environments.
Advancing Renewable Energy with Steel: Stainless and Carbon Steel Uses
In renewable energy, stainless and carbon steel are crucial. Stainless steel’s corrosion resistance suits wind turbines, while carbon steel’s cost-effectiveness benefits solar panel structures. Each material offers specific advantages for enhancing performance and sustainability in these sectors.
Stainless Steel in Wind Turbine Manufacturing
In the rapidly growing field of renewable energy, stainless steel stands out as an ideal material for wind turbine manufacturing. Owing to its remarkable rust resistance and elevated strength, stainless steel is ideally fit for the challenging conditions encountered by wind energy machinery.
Corrosion Resistance:
- Essential for offshore and coastal wind turbines.
- Extends equipment longevity in severe conditions.
Strength and Durability:
- Withstands high mechanical stress and fatigue.
- Ideal for critical components like rotor blades and towers.
Maintenance:
- Lowers maintenance needs due to its resilience.
- Reduces downtime and operational costs.
Recyclability:
- High recyclability aligns with the eco-friendly goals of wind energy.
- Supports sustainable manufacturing practices.
Thermal Stability:
- Maintains properties across temperature fluctuations.
- Ensures consistent performance in varied climates.
Key Components:
- Used in nacelles, bolts, and structural parts.
- Critical for ensuring the reliability and efficiency of wind turbines.
Stainless steel’s properties make it indispensable in the wind energy sector, enhancing durability, reducing maintenance, and supporting sustainability.
Carbon Steel in Solar Panel Manufacturing
Carbon steel is extensively used in producing solar panel frames and mounting systems in the solar power industry. Its affordability and strength make it a sensible option for support structures in solar setups.
Strength and Cost:
- Delivers strong support for solar panels.
- Presents a cost-effective alternative compared to other materials.
Corrosion Resistance:
- Requires protective coatings to prevent rust, especially in outdoor environments.
- Galvanized coatings enhance longevity in various weather conditions.
Durability:
- Suitable for structural components exposed to mechanical stress.
- Effective in holding solar panels securely in place.
Maintenance:
- Coatings require periodic inspection and maintenance.
- Maintenance needs increase in harsh environments, affecting long-term costs.
Recyclability:
- Carbon steel is recyclable, supporting eco-friendly practices.
- However, recycling often involves more processing compared to stainless steel.
Thermal Stability:
- Maintains structural integrity under temperature fluctuations.
- Handles thermal expansion and contraction effectively.
Key Components:
- Used in frames, mounting brackets, and support structures.
- Essential for creating stable and reliable solar panel installations.
Carbon steel’s advantages in strength and cost efficiency make it a key material in solar panel manufacturing, though its performance can be enhanced with proper coatings and maintenance.
How does the Choice Between Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel Impact Long-Term Maintenance Costs?
Stainless steel generally incurs lower maintenance costs due to its resistance to corrosion, while carbon steel may require frequent maintenance and protective coatings to prevent rust.
Which Steel Type Offers Better Performance for High-Temperature Applications?
Stainless steel performs better in high-temperature environments, maintaining its strength and integrity up to 1000°C, whereas carbon steel loses strength and hardness at elevated temperatures.
Does Carbon Steel Rust?
Yes, carbon steel rusts due to its iron content when exposed to air and moisture. It easily oxidizes without protective measures like coatings or regular maintenance, leading to corrosion and structural degradation. However, carbon steel remains a good choice if you’re looking for a low-cost yet strong metal.
Which is Better, Carbon Steel or Stainless Steel?
Stainless steel is generally better for environments where corrosion resistance is crucial, while carbon steel is preferable for its lower cost and high strength in less corrosive applications.
Is Carbon Steel Rust-Proof?
No, carbon steel is not rust-proof. It is prone to rust and corrosion if not properly protected or coated.
Choosing the Right Steel at SteelPro Group
In summary, carbon steel excels in strength and cost-effectiveness, making it suitable for structural applications. Stainless steel, with its excellent rust resistance and robustness, is perfect for settings demanding high performance and longevity. Both materials provide distinct benefits based on particular project requirements.
SteelPro Group is a premier steel supplier offering high-quality carbon and stainless steel solutions. With expert support and a commitment to excellence, we ensure the right materials for your needs, enhancing project success across various industries. Contact us now to get a quote that will satisfy you!
- Stainless Steel Grades
- 300 Series Stainless Steel
- 303 Stainless Steel
- 304 Stainless Steel
- 305 Stainless Steel
- 308 Stainless Steel
- 316 Stainless Steel
- 316N Stainless Steel
- 409 Stainless Steel
- 410 Stainless Steel
- 416 Stainless Steel
- 420 Stainless Steel
- 430 Stainless Steel
- 410HT And 410L Stainless Steels
- 410S Stainless Steel
- 440 Stainless Steel
- 436 Stainless Steel
- 301 Stainless Steel
- 201 Stainless Steel
- 202 Stainless Steel
- 444 Stainless Steel
- 405 Stainless Steel
- 302 Stainless Steel
- 309 Stainless Steel
- 314 Stainless Steel
- 321 Stainless Steel
- 347 Stainless Steel
- 408 Stainless Steel
- 422 Stainless Steel
- 431 Stainless Steel
- 434 Stainless Steel
- 414 Stainless Steel
- 430FR Stainless Steel
- 13-8 PH Stainless Steel
- 317 | 317L Stainless Steel
- 616 Stainless Steel
- 630 Stainless Steel
- 904L Stainless Steel
- A2 Stainless Steel
- 304 vs 304L Stainless Steel
- 304 VS 316 Stainless Steel
- 304 vs 409 Stainless Steel
- 304 vs 430 Stainless Steel
- 410 Stainless Steel vs 304
- 18/0 vs 18/10
- 18/0 Stainless Steel
- 18/8 Stainless Steel
- 18/10 Stainless Steel
Comparisons